Tim Shey has written a truly excellent response to Sahar Akhtar’s criticism of the iTunes Music Store (and, by proxy, the very concept of music downloads) in Salon. I particularly enjoyed Tim’s essay because it makes an argument that has always been very near and dear to my heart: namely, that the current, radio-centered, album-oriented approach to music promotion and distribution is not the only (or even the best) system possible. As Tim says:
Akhtar argues that sales of LPs are currently driven by a hit commercial single with radio airplay, which artists are encouraged to make to appeal to a large audience and which are usually “catchy and forgettable,” and that artists take their true flights of fancy on other LP tracks. This seems to me a gross oversimplification of the way musicians create music, and a potentially insulting one to both artists and the people who listen to them.
I couldn’t agree more. In my opinion, anyone who argues, as Akhtar does, that “the musical creativity and risk-taking associated with the album format will decline” as download services begin to dominate, has obviously never owned a copy of the Beatles’ Past Masters collection—two discs of songs originally released exclusively as singles. Included are “Day Tripper,” “We Can Work It Out,” “Paperback Writer,” “Rain” and “I Feel Fine”. These are some of the best (and, often, the most innovative) songs in the Beatles catalog, and none of them ever appeared on a proper album!
The next time someone tries to convince me that the album format has been a force for quality in pop music, I will point to the latest Billboard charts and remind them of Phil Spector’s famous definition of the word “album”: “two hit singles and eight pieces of shit!”